@ini_set( 'upload_max_size' , '256M' ); @ini_set( 'post_max_size', '256M'); @ini_set( 'max_execution_time', '300' );
Recently, the Biden-Harris Administration introduced another facet in its broader efforts to combat affordable housing shortages. On July 16, 2024, the Administration proposed federal rent control. The proposal would end certain tax breaks for corporate landlords with over 50 units in their portfolio unless the landlords agreed to limit rent increases on existing units to 5 percent per year. Landlords refusing to accede to the rent control would lose specific tax benefits, such as depreciation write-offs. The plan would affect about 20 million units nationwide and per the proposal would impact corporate landlords in the current year and the next two years. New rental housing and properties undergoing major renovations would be exempt. The rent cap is intended to serve as a bridge until more housing units can be built.
The concept of federal rent control has had its share of opponents from both sides. The Washington Post quoted Jason Furman, chair of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers and Harvard Professor, as saying “[r]ent control has been about as disgraced as any economic policy in the tool kit. The idea we’d be reviving and expanding it will ultimately make our housing supply problems worse, not better.” Professor Furman goes on to say that even if future units are exempted, rent control does not work, because it could change how developers consider their incentives.
Although the White House has released a fact sheet (available here), there are scant details on the overall plan and specifically, what tax breaks would be at risk for landlords. Most likely, bonus depreciation would be stripped away from those affected landlords not complying with the rent caps. Again, the proposal is part of a bigger plan envisioned by the Administration and members of Congress, including a Renter’s Bill of Rights (available here), repurposing of federal lands for affordable housing, a guidebook for commercial to residential conversions (available here) and bills recently introduced by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) that would provide a 20 percent tax credit for office conversions, which credit would be modeled off the historic preservation credit. At the state and local level, several initiatives, such as property tax abatements, have appeared.
FGMK, LLC will continue to monitor this proposal and other presidential campaign proposals, as well as required Congressional action, that may impact our clients. If you have inquiries about this proposal, please reach out for additional discussion.
David Benz | Randy Markowitz | |
Partner | Partner | |
Federal Tax | Federal Tax | |
(312) 818-4508 | (847) 940-3241 | |
dbenz@fgmk.com | rmarkowitz@fgmk.com |
The summary information in this document is being provided for education purposes only. Recipients may not rely on this summary other than for the purpose intended, and the contents should not be construed as accounting, tax, investment, or legal advice. We encourage any recipients to contact the authors for any inquiries regarding the contents. FGMK (and its related entities and partners) shall not be responsible for any loss incurred by any person that relies on this publication. About FGMK FGMK is a leading professional services firm providing assurance, tax and advisory services to privately held businesses, global public companies, entrepreneurs, high-net-worth individuals and not-for-profit organizations. FGMK is among the largest accounting firms in Chicago and one of the top ranked accounting firms in the United States. For over 50 years, FGMK has recommended strategies that give our clients a competitive edge. Our value proposition is to offer clients a hands-on operating model, with our most senior professionals actively involved in client service delivery.